Am 09.11.2012 11:01, schrieb Alexandre DERUMIER:
do you have tried fio with --numjobs option ? (I'll make more fio threads I
think, maybe set it to the number of cpu you have)
Doesn't make any difference. But i'm now at 18.000 iops ;-)
----- Mail original -----
De: "Stefan Priebe - Profihost AG" <[email protected]>
À: "Dietmar Maurer" <[email protected]>
Cc: "Alexandre DERUMIER" <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Envoyé: Vendredi 9 Novembre 2012 10:06:45
Objet: Re: [pve-devel] less cores more iops / speed
I'm pinnin inside the kvm process the fio process. SO it shouldn't be a
problem of librbd alone.
Stefan
Am 09.11.2012 09:59, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
Am 09.11.2012 09:50, schrieb Dietmar Maurer:
It's try to keep process on same numa node and I think it's also
doing some
dynamic pinning.
numad doesn't help but libvirt seems to support pinning of kvm instances.
Maybe pve should support pinning too?
So far I never had such problems.
IMHO, Manual pinning is the wrong way.
But doing heavy I/O with 8 Cores is much slower than with 2 Cores that can't
be correct...
What exactly is the suggestion? So far only rbd client shows such behavior?
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://pve.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
