Am 11.02.26 um 11:32 AM schrieb Thomas Lamprecht: > Am 10.02.26 um 14:53 schrieb Fiona Ebner: >> Fail the build when the list changes, so that new models can be >> picked up selectively and other changes that might require adaptations >> are not missed. > > thanks, any objection in storing this as pretty-formatted json? > As then the default line-based git diff is making comparisons simpler, > as while word-diff is great, it has it's limits IMO.
No objection, I was considering it too after sending and seeing the very long line in the patch. But wasn't sure :) > No need for a v2 in any case, as that change is easy enough to squash in. Thanks! > btw. starting to wonder if we should produce an extra architecture "all" > packages for such files, could reduce churn on selective uploads; but I'd > figure that the current rate of change will slow down a bit soon. One file for recognized aarch64 CPU flags might still come along in the context of the custom CPU model edit API/UI. Otherwise, changes to those files usually come together with switching to a new upstream version.
