On Thu, 07 Aug 2025 16:22:46 +0200, Shannon Sterz wrote:
> ...instead of re-implementing a custom check here. This has the
> side-effect that the check implemented by pve-container is much more
> robust and is less likely to yield false positive. So users won't get
> warnings about containers that actually do have the required unified
> cgroup v2 support.
>
> This was reported for an OpenSUSE Slowroll container on the forum:
> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/169302/
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks! Made a separate commit running 'make tidy' first and
rebased on top of that to get a clean change.
[1/1] 8 to 9: use check for unified cgroup v2 support via pve-container
commit: ea1f2523515d7639f754a0588ffd8800cdb3321f
and for stable-8:
[1/1] 8 to 9: use check for unified cgroup v2 support via pve-container
commit: 24cd98ac41e83efd3c235cd50e47c66429bb106b
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
