Am 30.07.25 um 20:00 schrieb Daniel Kral: > Remove HA resources from rules, where these HA resources are used, if > they are removed by delete_service_from_config(...), which is called by > the HA resources' delete API endpoint and possibly external callers, > e.g. if the HA resource is removed externally. > > If all of the rules' HA resources have been removed, the rule itself > must be removed as it would result in an erroneous rules config, which > would become user-visible at the next read and parse of the rules > config.
Do we the same for groups? Would be worth mentioning for such a case where we add new infra to replace existing one. And FWIW (definitively not a blocker), optionally keeping rules would be nice too, albeit since we got the "ignore" request-state for resources this probably doesn't really matter that much anymore, as one doesn't have to remove a service from HA anymore if one wants to temporarily control the resource directly. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
