On 7/23/25 17:06, Thomas Lamprecht wrote: [snip]
> I do not recall for sure anymore, but do differing bridge-ports work > transparently with the ifupdown2 changes from Christoph. With that it might be > nice to support it here too in the midterm, but that is certainly not a > blocker > for now. I'm not sure if I understand 100% - do you mean if the name used in bridge-ports differs from the name of the referenced interface in /e/n/i? That doesn't work currently, since the validation breaks. I've discussed this initially with Dominik today, and we'd need to resolve altnames every time we look up names from bridge-ports, etc. If we want to support mixing names in the configuration, then we'd additionally have to construct a temporary, merged, configuration and validate against that. > Applied with perltidy formatting changes squashed in, thanks! I will pay more attention to running `make tidy` in the future, still not used to the fact that we actually have a formatter now - sorry. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
