Am 08.07.25 um 12:16 schrieb Friedrich Weber: >> [...] and also because we execute commands even >> if they are not specified completely but if the user supplied string uniquely >> matches the start of an existing command, like "u" or "update" in this case >> here would be enough to trigger the command. > Right, that might be a bit dangerous. But, thinking about it, even if we > move the `updatelvm` code to a migration helper script, it could still > ask the user for confirmation before actually making changes (e.g. > "Disable autoactivation for all guest volumes in VG 'foo'? [Y/n]").
Yes, that seems sensible for the `-t STDOUT` case, which we normally use as heuristic to check if it's likely an interactive session. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
