Ping, still applies On 5/9/25 13:07, Michael Köppl wrote: > On 5/6/25 13:48, Christoph Heiss wrote: >> After testing this change and thinking about the maxroot change again, >> $hdsize / 4 doesn't really make sense. E.g. for an (unrealistically >> small, but still) disk of 8 GiB; if its unset, pve-root will be ~6.5 GiB >> in size, with the limit of 2 GiB, the installation fails due to >> ENOSPACE. >> >> The default calculations try really hard to make installations possible >> even on small disks, in Proxmox/Install.pm:create_lvm_volumes() >> >> So I'm not sure if we really should restrict it that much, or rather >> relax it in the documentation. > > Thought a bit about this. I agree that the sanity check should not > entirely stop users from creating setups that would work. An alternative > approach might be not to enforce the maxroot limit of $hdsize / 4 for > smaller disks. create_lvm_volumes() considers 12 GiB to be small, if I'm > not mistaken, and basically does a best-effort install. I'm not sure if > I like setting such an arbitrary limit for a sanity check, though. It > makes the sanity check intransparent if users cannot configure a root > volume size greater than 4 GiB if their hdsize is 16 GiB, but at the > same time are free to set it to 6 GiB if the hdsize is 8 GiB. What do > you think? > > Another alternative might be to simply display a warning that doesn't > stop users from installing, i.e. "Recommended maximum root volume size > is hdsize / 4". > > In both cases the documentation should be updated to reflect that. > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > >
_______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel