Am 04.04.25 um 18:08 schrieb Markus Frank:
> Signed-off-by: Markus Frank <m.fr...@proxmox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Fiona Ebner <f.eb...@proxmox.com>
> Reviewed-by: Laurențiu Leahu-Vlăducu <l.leahu-vlad...@proxmox.com
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Kral <d.k...@proxmox.com>
> Tested-by: Laurențiu Leahu-Vlăducu <l.leahu-vlad...@proxmox.com>
> Tested-by: Daniel Kral <d.k...@proxmox.com>
> Tested-by: Lukas Wagner <l.wag...@proxmox.com>
> ---
> no changes in v16
>
> debian/control | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
> index 196647dd..27925009 100644
> --- a/debian/control
> +++ b/debian/control
> @@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ Depends: dbus,
> socat,
> swtpm,
> swtpm-tools,
> + virtiofsd,
> ${misc:Depends},
> ${perl:Depends},
> ${shlibs:Depends},
What about adding this as recommends? It would be still pulled in by
default, user can opt out though, reducing the attack surface.
Would your code handle the case where the executable does not exist
with a somewhat nice error?
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
