On Fri, Apr 04, 2025 at 01:26:46PM +0200, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > > > On 4/4/25 09:51, Stefan Hanreich wrote: > >>> +/// > >>> +/// It checks for the following conditions: > >>> +/// * At most 63 characters long. > >>> +/// * It must not start or end with a hyphen. > >>> +/// * Must only contain ASCII alphanumeric characters as well as hyphens. > >>> +/// * It must not be purely numerical. > >>> +#[derive(Debug, Deserialize, Serialize, Clone, Eq, Hash, PartialOrd, > >>> Ord, PartialEq)] > >>> +pub struct Hostname(String); > >>> + > >>> +impl std::str::FromStr for Hostname { > >>> + type Err = HostnameError; > >>> + > >>> + fn from_str(hostname: &str) -> Result<Self, Self::Err> { > >>> + Self::new(hostname) > >>> + } > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> +impl AsRef<str> for Hostname { > >>> + fn as_ref(&self) -> &str { > >>> + &self.0 > >>> + } > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> +impl Display for Hostname { > >>> + fn fmt(&self, f: &mut std::fmt::Formatter<'_>) -> std::fmt::Result { > >>> + self.0.fmt(f) > >>> + } > >>> +} > >>> + > >>> +impl Hostname { > >>> + /// Constructs a new hostname from a string > >>> + /// > >>> + /// This function accepts characters in any case, but the resulting > >>> hostname will be > >>> + /// lowercased. > >>> + pub fn new(name_ref: impl AsRef<str>) -> Result<Self, HostnameError> > >>> { > >> > >> Nit: I'd recommend using a `check()` function which does not create the > >> `Hostname` itself, because then: > >> > >> - in `FromStr` we know we have a reference (&str) and need to clone. > >> - We could add a `TryFrom<&str>` wich just uses `.parse()` > >> - We could add a `TryFrom<String>` which avoids the clone. > > What about a constructor that just takes String (if a function needs to > own the value it should demand a String anyway) and then calling that > constructor from the proposed trait implementations? Maybe something > more generic than String as a param, but that could usually be tacked on > later without breaking the API.
I suppose that's fine. We'd clone in the error case, but that's not the expected case anyway. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel