Am 24.03.25 um 14:02 schrieb Wolfgang Bumiller: > The code below can also be factored out as AFAICT it, too, is a copy, if > `backup_file` is a parameter (which which `NULL` may be passed, as > `g_strdup()` explicitly maps NULL to NULL), and `uuid` as well I guess > (here it's not touched but may as well be cleared (or the function would > ignore it when NULL is passed)).
I now wonder if it's actually better to also generate a UUID for the backup access just like for the usual backup? It's returned as part of the result for query-backup and like that call sides could use the information (e.g. to see if it's still the same backup access) if ever required. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
