Am 12.02.25 um 11:55 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
> do we still want to bump this? do we also want to include other recent
> fixes for remote migration if we do so?
Not a huge fan, but it would be fine for me as long as they are
targeted; ensuring upgrade is easy reduces pressure for requiring an
LTS.
> On November 29, 2024 12:54 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>> From: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com>
>>
>> according to the schema, else some combinations of migration / guest /
>> storage settings will fail validation:
>>
>> 2024-05-15 11:48:51 ERROR: migration_snapshot: type check ('boolean') failed
>> - got ''
>>
>> since this is client / source side, remote migrations to a remote node
>> with validation enabled can fail without this change.
>>
>> The fact that this is required for Proxmox VE 7 was reported in the
>> community forum:
>> https://forum.proxmox.com/threads/158202/
>>
>> While Proxmox VE 7 is end-of-life since the end of July 2024, it's
>> still nice to keep upgrade paths to supported versions open.
Albeit remote migration was/is rather a bit experimental in general,
but as mentioned above I agree in general with the sentiment.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Lamprecht <t.lampre...@proxmox.com>
>> (cherry picked from commit 172ab9f5ccc40666478f2f83696e6b1e62090e2a)
>> [FE: add rationale for backport]
>> Signed-off-by: Fiona Ebner <f.eb...@proxmox.com>
>> ---
>> src/PVE/StorageTunnel.pm | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
