On November 13, 2024 10:22 am, Fiona Ebner wrote:
> On 12.11.24 5:46 PM, Fabian Grünbichler wrote:
>> On November 7, 2024 5:51 pm, Fiona Ebner wrote:
>>> + backup_state.target_id = g_strdup("Proxmox");
>>
>> if we take this opportunity to also support multiple PBS targets while
>> we are at it, it might make sense to make this more of a "legacy" value?
>> or not set it at all here to opt into the legacy behaviour?
>>
>
> Why isn't "Proxmox" a good legacy value? When we add support for passing
> in a target ID to qmp_backup(), I had in mind using "PBS-$storeid" or
> something along those lines.
because it might clash with actual target IDs? that's why I thought that
maybe not setting it at all in that case provides more flexibility to
differentiate..
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
