Currently trying to rebase this onto current pve-network, but there are some clashes with the MTU series (or rather, I need to implement MTU for the other zones as well now).
On 12/19/23 09:32, Alexandre Derumier wrote: > TO FIX: > > - Dnsmasq is currently buggy with ipv6 && vrf (no crash but it's not > listening), and need to be patched with: > https://thekelleys.org.uk/gitweb/?p=dnsmasq.git;a=commit;h=a889c554a7df71ff93a8299ef96037fbe05f2f55 > I have tested it, just applying this patch on current debian source is enough > to get is working. > > > - for layer2 network, we can't use a /128 for ipv6 like the /32 of ipv4. > ipv6 range is large, so it shouldn't be a problem for user to have a free > ip. (I can be the same on all vnets). > But that mean we can't reuse the gateway ip (or it'll conflict). > We need to be able to define a different ipv6 for dnsmasq server here. (and > make it mandatory for ipv6 in this plugins) Reading through this again: Wouldn't it make sense to use the link-local address then? Or is there something I'm missing? _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
