Am 12/09/2024 um 14:43 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler: > I do wonder whether we want to support the Borg and Example plugins > though? if not, it might make sense to not ship them (but maybe just > test them?)..
FWIW, we could move them to a separate repository named something like "pve-storage-plugin-examples" which could also host one or two examples for the storage plugins (like SSHFS). We can then still decide to actually support it as, e.g., opt-in package(s) built from that repo. > there's a pretty tight coupling between storage plugin and backup > provider plugin - that might lead to some complaints (e.g., I can > imaging quite a few backup providers that just require some local file > system for temp storage, and users wondering why they can't just enable > that for an existing dir storage). it does make some things easier > though, so I am not sure we need to change that, just wanted to draw > attention to it. FWIW, if we get feedback and can extract a base for a common use case we should be able to do something like addinmg a new perl module implementing most for that use case, on which such providers can then base their implementation on. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
