For the record, we talked about this in person for a bit with the following outcome:
- there was a bit of a misunderstanding w.r.t. my heavy exaggeration for the point's sake, I really did not mean that as accusation at all, but that's now talked out - it's a good point that the package that was included in the first 7.0 ISO release was already new enough API version wise, and we also checked the package archives, and there we also got only new enough libpve-storage-perl package versions, so we can keep the change as is. We also agreed that it would be great to mention such analysis in the commit message the next time, and I know Fiona is very thorough with that stuff, and that this time it was just not mentioned due to the difference in how upgrade requirements and recommendations got interpreted by her and me, so I mention this mostly for other readers, as this applies to all of us. - we might want to document this expectation w.r.t API backward compat more definitively in a more approachable way, but should ensure that its clarified that this is for developers, not users, to avoid users thinking its always fine to upgrade from an outdated point release to a newer major release. tl;dr: got sorted out and change can be kept as is _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
