v3 out: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-July/064635.html
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 11:56:37AM GMT, Christoph Heiss wrote: > Pretty straight forward overall, implements a check for an existing > `rpool` on the system and ask the user whether they would like to rename > it, much in the same way as it works for VGs already. > > Without this, the installer would silently create a second (and thus > conflicting) `rpool` and cause a boot failure after the installation, > since it does not know which pool to import exactly. > > v1: https://lists.proxmox.com/pipermail/pve-devel/2024-May/063874.html > > Notable changes v1 -> v2: > * incorporated Aaron suggestions from v1 > * rewrote tests to use a pre-defined input instead > * moved pool renaming to own subroutine > * documented all new subroutines > * split out tests into own patch > > Christoph Heiss (3): > proxmox: add zfs module for retrieving importable zpool info > test: add test cases for new zfs module > low-level: install: check for already-existing `rpool` on install > > Proxmox/Install.pm | 30 +++++++++++ > Proxmox/Makefile | 1 + > Proxmox/Sys/ZFS.pm | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > test/Makefile | 7 ++- > test/zfs-get-pool-list.pl | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++ > 5 files changed, 203 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > create mode 100644 Proxmox/Sys/ZFS.pm > create mode 100755 test/zfs-get-pool-list.pl > > -- > 2.44.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > pve-devel mailing list > pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com > https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel > > _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel