On 28.03.22 13:10, Aaron Lauterer wrote:
> Returning the block devices is more useful than the device node. The
> device node usually points to the DM device for bluestore OSDs:
> /dev/dm-x
>
> In almost all situations one will be interested in the physical device
> underneath, /dev/sdX or /dev/nvmeXnY. In the rare case that someone
> isn't, then one can get a lot of more information by running
> `ceph osd metadata <osd nr>`.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aaron Lauterer <a.laute...@proxmox.com>
> ---
> PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm b/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm
> index 93433b3a..c3d1384e 100644
> --- a/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm
> +++ b/PVE/API2/Ceph/OSD.pm
> @@ -143,9 +143,9 @@ __PACKAGE__->register_method ({
> if ($e->{type} eq 'osd' && $osdmd) {
> if ($osdmd->{bluefs}) {
> $new->{osdtype} = 'bluestore';
> - $new->{blfsdev} = $osdmd->{bluestore_bdev_dev_node};
> - $new->{dbdev} = $osdmd->{bluefs_db_dev_node};
> - $new->{waldev} = $osdmd->{bluefs_wal_dev_node};
> + $new->{blfsdev} = $osdmd->{bluestore_bdev_devices};
> + $new->{dbdev} = $osdmd->{bluefs_db_devices};
> + $new->{waldev} = $osdmd->{bluefs_wal_devices};
> } else {
> $new->{osdtype} = 'filestore';
> }
"device_ids" (e.g.: "sdb=HGST_HDN724040ALE640_PK2334PEGNVD6T") could be also
interesting,
but probably separately as its a bit longer but still, could avoid a extra
shell lookup.
For the UI patch: do we want to hint when the db/wal is on the OSD itself as
fallback?
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
