Am 22.12.21 um 14:52 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
into new top-level helper for re-use with remote migration.

Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com>
---
new in v3

  PVE/Storage.pm | 14 ++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/PVE/Storage.pm b/PVE/Storage.pm
index 05be3dd..4f3a44a 100755
--- a/PVE/Storage.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage.pm
@@ -643,6 +643,14 @@ my $volname_for_storage = sub {
      }
  };
+# whether a migration snapshot is needed for a given storage
+sub storage_migrate_snapshot {
+    my ($cfg, $storeid) = @_;
+    my $scfg = storage_config($cfg, $storeid);
+
+    return $scfg->{type} eq 'zfspool' || $scfg->{type} eq 'btrfs';
+}
+
  sub storage_migrate {
      my ($cfg, $volid, $target_sshinfo, $target_storeid, $opts, $logfunc) = @_;
@@ -688,10 +696,8 @@ sub storage_migrate { my $migration_snapshot;
      if (!defined($snapshot)) {
-       if ($scfg->{type} eq 'zfspool' || $scfg->{type} eq 'btrfs') {
-           $migration_snapshot = 1;
-           $snapshot = '__migration__';
-       }
+       $migration_snapshot = storage_migrate_snapshot->($cfg, $target_storeid);

The call is wrong, because of the ->

And why base the decision on the target storage rather than keeping it based on the source storage? That breaks migration from e.g. lvm-thin to btrfs, because it now tries to use a snapshot and doesn't find any common transfer format anymore.

+       $snapshot = '__migration__' if $migration_snapshot;
      }
my @formats = volume_transfer_formats($cfg, $volid, $target_volid, $snapshot, $base_snapshot, $with_snapshots);


_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel

Reply via email to