Am 22.12.21 um 14:52 schrieb Fabian Grünbichler:
into new top-level helper for re-use with remote migration.
Signed-off-by: Fabian Grünbichler <f.gruenbich...@proxmox.com>
---
new in v3
PVE/Storage.pm | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/PVE/Storage.pm b/PVE/Storage.pm
index 05be3dd..4f3a44a 100755
--- a/PVE/Storage.pm
+++ b/PVE/Storage.pm
@@ -643,6 +643,14 @@ my $volname_for_storage = sub {
}
};
+# whether a migration snapshot is needed for a given storage
+sub storage_migrate_snapshot {
+ my ($cfg, $storeid) = @_;
+ my $scfg = storage_config($cfg, $storeid);
+
+ return $scfg->{type} eq 'zfspool' || $scfg->{type} eq 'btrfs';
+}
+
sub storage_migrate {
my ($cfg, $volid, $target_sshinfo, $target_storeid, $opts, $logfunc) = @_;
@@ -688,10 +696,8 @@ sub storage_migrate {
my $migration_snapshot;
if (!defined($snapshot)) {
- if ($scfg->{type} eq 'zfspool' || $scfg->{type} eq 'btrfs') {
- $migration_snapshot = 1;
- $snapshot = '__migration__';
- }
+ $migration_snapshot = storage_migrate_snapshot->($cfg, $target_storeid);
The call is wrong, because of the ->
And why base the decision on the target storage rather than keeping it
based on the source storage? That breaks migration from e.g. lvm-thin to
btrfs, because it now tries to use a snapshot and doesn't find any
common transfer format anymore.
+ $snapshot = '__migration__' if $migration_snapshot;
}
my @formats = volume_transfer_formats($cfg, $volid, $target_volid, $snapshot, $base_snapshot, $with_snapshots);
_______________________________________________
pve-devel mailing list
pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com
https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel