On 02.12.20 13:56, Dominik Csapak wrote: > instead of relying on the contentTypeField (which does not need to > exists, e.g. for iscsi), explicitely write it into the panel/icon > mapping and check that
why not return it for iSCIS? > > better would be if we query the backend about storage capabilities, > but such an api call does not exist yet, so this should be ok for now that's not true, the content type is exactly how the backend provides that, that's why I used it. I'd like to avoid to further duplicating info all over the place. _______________________________________________ pve-devel mailing list pve-devel@lists.proxmox.com https://lists.proxmox.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pve-devel
