> On 22 Jun 2017, at 15:42, jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org> wrote: > > > So why not go with that? The link owner is relevant only to modifying or > removing the link itself, and since you're managing it via Puppet, I don't > see what purpose it serves to relax the permissions for that. The link owner > and permissions have no relevance to traversing the link (see symlink(7)).
E.g. postgres does not work when the data dir is a link not owned by the postgres user Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CF40587E-8E3A-4234-9A5E-987B3D6D52E0%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
