On 3 February 2017 at 11:12, Martin Alfke <tux...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David, > > many thanks for sharing your ideas. > > As you already know: personally I don’t say that types and providers are > way to difficult. > It is more a matter on how to explain them. > I will dig through your document during weekend. We can have a chat on > Monday in Ghent. > > But besides this: > is your idea somehow related to the libral project? > https://github.com/puppetlabs/libral > > >
> > * It maps 1:1 to the capabilities of PCore, and is similar to the libral > interface description (see [libral#1](https://github.com/ > puppetlabs/libral/pull/2)). This ensures future interoperability between > the different parts of the ecosystem. > > libral is a neighbouring project, with its own set of distinct design goals. Staying bidirectionally compatible is a necessary requisite for this proposal here. (Which can be handled on both sides, depending on a wide variety of things). Cheers, David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CALF7fHb9b7HknTGrhMbu5213kpMX3rHg-nwiOKr2jvcqnzTh-Q%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
