Hi,
When I read some recommendation about using hieradata/profile/roles I
always find people saying to put the data inside the profile (in hiera)
like
profile::cms::key1: value1
profile::mysql::key2: value2
profile::webserveur::key3: value3
Why it's not recommended to put the value inside the role like
role::my_cms::key1: value1
role::my_cms::key2: value2
role::my_cms::key3: value3
then inside the
role/my_cms/init.pp
do something like
class role::my_cms (
$key1,
$key2,
$key3,
)
{
class {'profile::cms':
key1 => $key1
}
class {'profile::mysql':
key2 => $key2
}
etc.
The reason I ask is, if the key1/value1 is the (for example) the password of the
database, I can either do
profile::cms::key1: value1
profile::mysql::key2: "%hiera('profile::cms::key1')
or put all "intelligence" inside the role by
class role::my_cms (
$key1,
$key2,
$key3,
)
{
class {'profile::cms':
key1 => $key1
}
class {'profile::mysql':
key2 => $key1
}
I find this second solution more clean, because the guy who need to create
a cms just got to put all information inside the hieradata (without
understand the hiera('profile::cms::Key1') )
Regards.
--
Albert SHIH
DIO bātiment 15
Observatoire de Paris
5 Place Jules Janssen
92195 Meudon Cedex
France
xmpp: j...@obspm.fr
Heure local/Local time:
mer 16 nov 2016 08:34:00 CET
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/20161116074512.GB28124%40pcjas.obspm.fr.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
