that's exactly what I was after. Since this is my first type/provider pair I'm proceeding cautiously.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 11:09 AM Felix Frank < felix.fr...@alumni.tu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 02/27/2015 05:02 PM, Peter Berghold wrote: > > can I guess that the first def mod is what is referred to as a "getter" > > and second is a "setter?" Can I stretch that inference to say that if > > the value being passed to the setter is the same as what the getter is > > seeing it won't be set again? > > > > Yes, this is basically a getter/setter pair. > > However, the idempotency is implemented closer to the type layer. The > transaction code will check whether properties are out of sync, and > invoke the provider "=" methods to take action if necessary. > > On this higher level, your assertion should hold true. But I'm not sure > if that's what you were asking. > > HTH, > Felix > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/ > msgid/puppet-users/54F09689.7070607%40alumni.tu-berlin.de. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAArvnv0FwW2wFqye_VU_LRX4yyFD4yu0O6VVVDQOQ0Q9Yxi3Tg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
