I have to use an ENC as there are DB calls to be made to determine which nodes get which SW.
AFAIU hiera can't do this. On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 6:13:42 AM UTC-7, R.I. Pienaar wrote: > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "jcbollinger" <john.bollin...@stjude.org> > > To: "puppet-users" <puppet...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 1:09:04 PM > > Subject: [Puppet Users] Re: ENC vs manifest - cage match > > > On Wednesday, October 29, 2014 5:44:41 AM UTC-5, JonY wrote: > >> > >> If we throw these two into the octagon.. who wins? If one says "add it" > >> and the other says "remove it".. what do I end up with? > >> > > > > Two techs enter, one tech leaves! > > > > Or not. > > > > I really can't agree with the premise that a winner between those two > can > > be declared in absolute terms, and in any case they are not mutually > > exclusive. > > > > Felix makes an excellent point that Hiera can serve many of the same > > purposes that an ENC can do. When you throw in the possibility of > > providing a custom Hiera back end, I'm prepared to say that anything it > is > > possible to do with an ENC, it is also possible to do with Hiera + > > manifest. Some things may be more *convenient* to do via the ENC > > with the exception of setting the environment from the master side which > ENCs > can do and hiera cant > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/e640e593-257b-4921-9850-a250d72f0cbf%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
