>> I was just testing the host config file from puppetdb coupled with the >> documentation on the beaker documentation. > > Those docs honestly look old, they are still mentioning blimpy which I > effectively deprecated/superseded with the aws_sdk driver. > >> I was actually going to omit the error message. That's actually all of it >> except for the json output of the compiled beaker configs. I can send the >> full output in the morning. > > Send the full output and the configuration and I can take a closer > look. Anything less, I'll probably struggle. > >> It looks like the Google Compute Engine docs are more complete... It >> doesn't matter where it runs. Mostly looking for a free tier cloud to get >> started with. I'm not sure aws micro would even be big enough anyways. But >> it'd be cool to get it working. > > Sure, well we use EC2 heavily so I'm happy to help you there, I know > some people use Google Compute Engine also, but I have no intimate > knowledge of how this one works.
Actually Brett, maybe this is a better approach. I've got a working new project here showing beaker + beaker-rspec with EC2 support: https://github.com/kbarber/sample-beaker And you can see how I've launched it here: https://gist.github.com/kbarber/850a7d88fce409592bab Perhaps a better example will set you straight :-). It does fail incidentally, but it is kind of meant to as an example. Perhaps you can start with this project skeleton and modify to taste. Now as Justin mentioned, you do need a ~/.fog file - this was primarily to be compatible with the old Blimpy driver, but alas, we don't use Fog any more. The file should look something like: :default: :aws_access_key_id: AAAAAA :aws_secret_access_key: BBBBBB (And obviously match your own EC2 access keys and secrets) Also pay close attention to the config/image_templates/ec2.yaml file ... these map names of images to AMIs today, and the AMIs provided are the ones we use for our own testing, but you might want to maintain your own list. This is entirely up to you, just be aware each AMI needs a small amount of pre-setup if you want to create your own (that is certain minimal things might need 'baking' into the image, but nothing drastic). Of course, you are free to use the ones here, but if you need customisation I'd suggest forking your own images :-). Let me know how you get on with that. I think generally speaking all of this needs an overhaul in regards to usability, a lot of this awkward layout is due to backwards compatibility from legacy elements. That aside, once you get the fundamental elements right it should be okay. ken. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/CAE4bNT%3DzPBPSQi04EWH8J7sbMqmV0OXititEcgbPGM8utnjzGg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
