Hunter

Thanks for the updated gem. Will give it a go when I have a few mins :) 

Cheers
Gav

On Tuesday, 10 June 2014 00:05:40 UTC+1, Hunter Haugen wrote:
>
> Sorry about that; I was thinking of mocha as more of an extraneous 
> dependency rather than a feature. Turns out that the mock_with :mocha line 
> was a "feature" of puppetlabs_spec_helper and removing it changed the 
> behavior of projects which depend on PSH. That's what I get for releasing 
> on friday...
>
> I have released 0.5.1 which adds back the mocha dependency and mock_with 
> :mocha.
>
> Eventually I would like to see puppetlabs_spec_helper's helpful features 
> (like the puppet indirection initialization adapter pattern code and 
> fixtures) move into rspec-puppet, and its muddled/questionable aspects 
> resolved as to whether they should be removed or migrated into another more 
> appropriate place. At least the module team now owns this code and it can 
> start moving again.
>
>
>
> -Hunter
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Garrett Honeycutt <
> g...@garretthoneycutt.com <javascript:>> wrote:
> On 6/9/14, 12:49 PM, Clayton O'Neill wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 11:23 AM, fatmcgav <fatm...@gmail.com 
> <javascript:>
> > <mailto:fatm...@gmail.com <javascript:>>> wrote:
> >
> >     Afternoon all,
> >
> >     Just thought I'd make the lists aware of an issue I hit with
> >     puppetlabs_spec_helper v0.5.0 today.
> >
> >     It would appear that changes committed in [1] results in the
> >     dropping of mocha as a dependency, and therefore any tests depending
> >     on mocha failing.
> >     The error I was seeing was:
> >
> >     
> Failure/Error:Puppet::Type.type(:application).stubs(:defaultprovider).returns
> >     described_class
> >
> >     NoMethodError:
> >
> >     undefined method `stubs' for Puppet::Type::Application:Class
> >
> >     # ./spec/unit/puppet/provider/application/asadmin_spec.rb:6
> >
> >     A work-around for me was to pin puppetlabs_spec_helper to v0.4.x. [2]
> >
> >
> > I just ran into the same problem.  Is this a bug, or a change in API?  I
> > also worked around it via '~> 0.4.1'.
>
>
> Hi,
>
> Created a ticket[1] asking Puppet Labs to release this as 1.0.0, so that
> each release cannot break the API as so many of us depend on this.
>
> [1] - https://tickets.puppetlabs.com/browse/PUP-2743
>
> Br,
> -g
>
> --
> Garrett Honeycutt
> @learnpuppet
> Puppet Training with LearnPuppet.com
> Mobile: +1.206.414.8658
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Puppet Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to puppet-users...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/5395E97A.9050005%40garretthoneycutt.com
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/bde8ae76-df80-4ed1-8fb5-00de3c94b51b%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to