On 06/05/2014 01:28 AM, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
> I would assume from basic class syntax one could just do a::b::c etc
> to pull stuff in from
> subclassing and roll it up to the equivalent of chef roles.
Hi,
I suggest that you would be Doing It Wrong then.
The author of the blogpost you linked has apparently inherited a Puppet
code base that follows a lot of questionable practices. Or perhaps he
was just confused by the node concepts that are absent from chef. What
he failed to realize is that a node in Puppet is exactly what he
describes as a "node in chef, unlike in Puppet".
Basically, what you want to do is the same he describes for chef.
node my.fqdn.org {
include role::webserver
}
class role::webserver {
include profile::base
include profile::webserver
}
class profile::webserver {
include profile::apache
include profile::openssl
...
}
It is unclear why the author is so obsessed with nodes - the primary
form of expressing such relationships is indeed the class.
HTH,
Felix
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/538FAE5B.5060901%40Alumni.TU-Berlin.de.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
