On Monday, March 31, 2014 3:55:03 PM UTC-5, Henrik Lindberg wrote: > > Going forward, I think the Puppet Language should handle the situation > where more than one resource definition / class definition is made and > where the two are considered compatible (they describe the "same > state"). We are discussing solutions for this with the idea to solve > this during Puppet 4x. > >
I'd really be interested in hearing more about that. In particular, I'm interested in how one might judge whether resource declarations are compatible when they are not identical (after defaults, overrides, and any other relevant modifications are applied). I still have yet to hear any approach to this problem that I like better than my "constraints" idea, now more than two years old: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/puppet-users/module$20compatibility$20constraints/puppet-users/Fvl0aOe4RPE/XpoI1oKpTF0J. On the other hand, I haven't heard much of anything new on the topic since that particular thread went cold. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/1114aab7-a739-4c6c-820f-f3aff6437344%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
