Gareth/Garret Not sure if it helps, but I've managed to exclude stuff from Coveralls by using simplecov filters...
E.g.: https://github.com/fatmcgav/puppet-glassfish/commit/5f7d40c2257f469a297edd04a7dbac068306b82b Gav On Friday, 7 February 2014 02:51:26 UTC, Garrett Honeycutt wrote: > > On 1/26/14 7:50 AM, Gareth Rushgrove wrote: > > For anyone else who likes writing tests for their puppet manifests, > > I've just added basic code coverage to rspec-puppet: > > > > A blog post here about how to use it: > > > > > http://www.morethanseven.net/2014/01/25/code-coverage-for-puppet-modules/ > > > > I'd be interested in any feedback on how to improve or add to this. > > > > Cheers > > > > Gareth > > > > Gareth, > > Great blog post. I tried this on a module with 100% coverage and notice > that it reports back 50% coverage. After some poking around, found that > it is checking code in spec/fixtures/, the stdlib module actually. There > seems to be an open issue[1] regarding the inability to exclude things. > Curious if you found a work around for testing your code and not the > modules pulled in from .fixtures.yml. > > [1] - https://github.com/lemurheavy/coveralls-public/issues/184 > > BR, > -g > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/f1b6bfb4-32c0-4cf8-a58a-b6871db72211%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
