Seems to me more like: After a year we still haven't found time for this. Let's keep our bug database manageable but only keeping the stuff we can do within a reasonable time or the bug reports that contain some troubleshooting effort we don't want to redo.
Quite a reasonable approach I'd say. With open bug databases, it's easy for the tool to lose it's value due to unmanageable backlogs. On Friday, December 6, 2013 10:35:13 AM UTC+9, Philip Brown wrote: > > > https://projects.puppetlabs.com/issues/14368#change-101086 > > Summary: > > (We dont need to improve our public documentation, because people can go > BUY documentation for puppet) > > I can understand changing it to low priority or something. > But *Rejecting* this issue? > For a supposedly "free, open source" project? Really? > > This does not motivate me to continue advocating for use of puppet, let > alone developing for it. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/9b1cb696-4aa6-4a24-acd0-6728f626c0a8%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
