Have a look at pam_shield. It can protect any services that use PAM for authentication (i.e. ssh, authenticated mail, but not web). It can use either null-routing or iptables rules for blocking. If you set it to use null-routing then it doesn't interfere with puppetlabs/firewall - we are using these two modules together without problems.

https://github.com/jtniehof/pam_shield

Cheers,
Jonathan


On 30/10/13 09:36, Daniele Sluijters wrote:
Hi,

Ah indeed, I misread the puppetlabs-denyhosts module. I had a look at the DenyHosts project but that seems limited to SSH alone. My fail2ban has rules that scan logs of our web servers, mail etc.

--
Daniele Sluijters

On Wednesday, 30 October 2013 01:39:56 UTC+1, Don Hoffman wrote:

    On reading your message, I think you are perhaps confusing the
    static Linux /etc/host.deny mechanism with the DenyHosts project.
     See http://denyhosts.sourceforg.net
    <http://denyhosts.sourceforg.net>


    Don

    On Oct 29, 2013, at 5:32 PM, Donald Hoffman <don.h...@gmail.com
    <javascript:>> wrote:

    > On Oct 29, 2013, at 12:00 PM, Daniele Sluijters
    <daniele....@gmail.com <javascript:>> wrote:
    >
    >> Hi,
    >>
    >> DenyHosts is not an option for me since I can't predict which
    hosts will be connecting from the outside. Fail2ban solves that
    issue by looking for odd behaviour instead of asking me to whitelist.
    >>
    >> Thanks for the suggestion though,
    >>
    >> --
    >> Daniele Sluijters
    >
    > Hmm.  Don’t quite follow.   DenyHost works pretty much the same
    as fail2ban on the detection side.  I.e. “looking for odd
    behavior".  See this entry from their FAQ:
    http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/faq.html#1_5
    <http://denyhosts.sourceforge.net/faq.html#1_5>
    >
    > The DenyHost daemon monitors /var/log/secure for various signs
    of unsuccessful attempts to connect (from anywhere).  Once a
    threshold is reached a rule for that IP address is inserted in to
    /etc/host.deny.   Pretty much has the same detection features as
    Fail2ban.
    >
    > It is only on the filtering side where DenyHosts and Fail2ban
    really differ.  Fail2ban sets up iptables firewall rules while
    DenyHosts adds entries to hosts.deny for filtering in the app
    (usually sshd) server daemon.
    >
    > Don
    >
    >

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/d03394af-4bf0-4bc0-b250-d3d125a22ab5%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/puppet-users/52738BAE.3060200%40bristol.ac.uk.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to