We use both as they solve different problems. I don't use any of the OS provisioning or metering in 12c as i use puppet for that but being that we run a lot of oracle stuff, i use the oracle management tool packs quite extensively. We run puppet agents offline and use mcollective to orchestrate all changes, that way there isn't the burden of so many agents running on each host 100% of the time.. (Which was the biggest downfall of Puppet + 12c)
What features are you looking to implement? What are you trying to solve? do you already have 12c licensing? What is your vitalization or hardware layer? On Saturday, September 28, 2013 6:40:11 PM UTC-5, dkoleary wrote: > > Hey; > > I'm still very new to puppet having *just* finished the pro puppet book. > Going to have to go back to that a few times for re-reading, I suspect. > Any rate, I have a client who's leaning very heavily towards OEM w/the > configuration management pack. Despite some fairly exhaustive google > sessions, I haven't been able to find a direct comparison between these > two. I have found a couple of troubling points (like cost); but, nothing > saying how well these two CM apps compare/contrast with each other. Does > anyone here have any experience w/OEM and how it compares against puppet? > > Any info, stories, tips, or links would be greatly appreciated. > > Thanks. > > Doug O'Leary > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
