On Wednesday, July 10, 2013 12:57:32 PM UTC-5, Ashley Penney wrote: > > Hi guys, > > As I mentioned in a previous email I've refactored ntp and released a > 1.0.0 release candidate. There's one outstanding "flaw" remaining that's > bothering me and I wanted to solicit opinions on the list. We currently > maintain a template per distribution that is close to the stock > distribution provided ntp configuration. This leads to massive sprawl and > means adding a distribution means yet another template. > > Would users of the ntp module mind if we unified this all into a single > template? Obviously we'd have to pick one as the best "base" template and > move over to using it and deal with the fact that your ntp configuration > would significantly change. >
Currently, users have the alternative of specifying their own custom template instead of one of those packaged with the module. If the proposed change would remove that option, then it would be a significant step backward. If, however, the question is merely whether it would be important to me for the module by default to apply an NTP config file that is as similar as possible to my distro's stock file, then no, that is not an issue at all. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
