Hi John and all,
Am 25.04.2013 um 17:22 schrieb jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org>:
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:28:55 AM UTC-5, Patricia Jung wrote:
> please consider the following scenario: Puppet is supposed to set up similar
> (but not necessarily identical) groups of hosts for a range of customers. For
> each customer a dedicated filesystem tree needs to be established on host A.
>
>
> I'm not sure I follow, but I think you mean "host A" a designated special
> node somewhere. It's not clear whether that's one of the hosts in a
> per-customer group, but maybe that doesn't matter.
A is a designated host outside the per-customer group. To be more specific:
It's a Nagios host with customer-specific directories for the customer-specific
Nagios objects created both, manually and by the Nagios exported resources.
>
> It sounds to me like exported resources are the wrong solution to this
> problem. What prevents you from declaring the needed filesystem trees as
> ordinary resources declared for node A?
The customer-specific filesystem tree within the Nagios configuration must not
exist unless there is at least one customer host defined. If I had to declare
it ordinarily for node A I had to touch A's definitions every time I'm adding
or removing a new customer.
Thanks for caring!
Patricia
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
