Hi John and all,
Am 25.04.2013 um 17:22 schrieb jcbollinger <[email protected]>:
> On Wednesday, April 24, 2013 7:28:55 AM UTC-5, Patricia Jung wrote:
> please consider the following scenario: Puppet is supposed to set up similar
> (but not necessarily identical) groups of hosts for a range of customers. For
> each customer a dedicated filesystem tree needs to be established on host A.
>
>
> I'm not sure I follow, but I think you mean "host A" a designated special
> node somewhere. It's not clear whether that's one of the hosts in a
> per-customer group, but maybe that doesn't matter.
A is a designated host outside the per-customer group. To be more specific:
It's a Nagios host with customer-specific directories for the customer-specific
Nagios objects created both, manually and by the Nagios exported resources.
>
> It sounds to me like exported resources are the wrong solution to this
> problem. What prevents you from declaring the needed filesystem trees as
> ordinary resources declared for node A?
The customer-specific filesystem tree within the Nagios configuration must not
exist unless there is at least one customer host defined. If I had to declare
it ordinarily for node A I had to touch A's definitions every time I'm adding
or removing a new customer.
Thanks for caring!
Patricia
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
