On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Nathan Shirlberg <nathan...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Thanks for the suggestion. I'll look into that. I have started appending > the version to the package name and with the plan to use something like > hiera as a lookup to determine what version should be on each machine. We > would have the build server publish each version to puppet as an artifact > and then "deployments" would be completed by updating hiera (or something > else) to make the version active. Does that sound like a bad idea? > Nathan > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > Sounds fine, some of Microsoft's own MSI's do the same, e.g. 'Microsoft Visual C++ 2008 Redistributable - x86 9.0.30729.4148' Josh -- Josh Cooper Developer, Puppet Labs -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
