On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM, jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org> wrote:
> I am open to the idea of offering architectural advice, but I don't have
> either sufficient understanding of your requirements or sufficient
> understanding of your current code to offer any at this point. As for
> practical advice on your present question, you already have most of what I
> can give you. Basically, either have the definition receive the needed data
> via its parameters, or split it into multiple, more narrowly-purposed
> definitions, unless you happen to see a fit with Hiera.
Just to close the loop on the public ML: thanks to John and a few
other folks we're now pursuing a full re-architecting of the Bigtop's
puppet code. All the interested parties can keep track of our
efforts over here (you can subscribe yourself to wiki updates):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Next+generation+Puppet+code+for+Bigtop+deployment
Hopefully the outcome of this exercise will be useful not only
to the Apache Bigtop, but to the bigger pupper user community
as well.
Thanks,
Roman.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
