On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:50 PM, jcbollinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> I am open to the idea of offering architectural advice, but I don't have
> either sufficient understanding of your requirements or sufficient
> understanding of your current code to offer any at this point. As for
> practical advice on your present question, you already have most of what I
> can give you. Basically, either have the definition receive the needed data
> via its parameters, or split it into multiple, more narrowly-purposed
> definitions, unless you happen to see a fit with Hiera.
Just to close the loop on the public ML: thanks to John and a few
other folks we're now pursuing a full re-architecting of the Bigtop's
puppet code. All the interested parties can keep track of our
efforts over here (you can subscribe yourself to wiki updates):
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BIGTOP/Next+generation+Puppet+code+for+Bigtop+deployment
Hopefully the outcome of this exercise will be useful not only
to the Apache Bigtop, but to the bigger pupper user community
as well.
Thanks,
Roman.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Puppet Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
