On Tuesday, February 5, 2013 6:27:26 AM UTC-8, jcbollinger wrote: > > > > On Monday, February 4, 2013 11:49:24 PM UTC-6, David Kerr wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 4, 2013 9:07:49 PM UTC-8, Aaron Russo wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 7:37 PM, David Kerr <ker...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> <% @foo = 0 %> >>>> <% Array(bar).each do |flan| -%> >>>> value <%= @foo %> >>>> <% @foo += 1 %> >>>> <% end %> >>>> >>> >>> This code worked for me. I just used an inline template, but otherwise >>> I had exactly what you had: >>> >>> link: https://gist.github.com/arusso23/4712284 >>> >>> (I'm on 3.0.1 btw) >>> >>> >> >> hmm, ok thanks, good to know it SHOULD work =) >> >> I believe my problem is that i'm using concat and my expectations of how >> that works are incorrect. >> >> > > You didn't say what those expectations were, but I'm guessing you hoped > the counter would retain its value across multiple evaluations of the > template. Perhaps that's why you used a member variable for your counter > instead of a local variable. You should expect, however, that every time > you invoke the template() or inline_template() function, a new ERB instance > will be created to evaluate the given template, so even if you worked > around the re-initialization of your counter, I would not expect a > continuous sequence across multiple template evaluations. > > Supposing that you have all the data you want to sequence in one place, > one possibility could be to generate your content all in one template. If > you don't have it all in one place, on the other hand, and you can't assign > sequence numbers manually, then I am skeptical about sequence numbers being > useful to you / doing what you want even if you could generate them. > > If you tell us more about the problem then maybe we'll have > better-targeted suggestions. > > > John > > Sorry about that, I usually try to keep my questions it simple and generic to avoid getting bogged down in details, but as you suggested it's the details that are killer here. So I'll go deeper into the problem. You guessed correct though, my assumption was that each concact::fragment would get a buffer containing every exported element and then i'd have to loop over it. And that's obviously not the case, each concat::fragment gets executed once per each element.
So what I have is a PgPool config file, it's fairly large and there are a number of tunables in it. At the end of the file is the server section that looks basically needs to look like like: backend_hostname0 = 192.168.1.10 backend_port0 = 5432 backend_weight0 = 1 backend_data_directory0 = '/db/pg' backend_flag0 = 'ALLOW_TO_FAILOVER' backend_hostname1 = 192.168.1.11 backend_port1 = 5432 backend_weight1 = 1 backend_data_directory1 = '/db/pg' backend_flag1 = 'ALLOW_TO_FAILOVER' pgpool requires you start with 0 and go in sequence, i tried putting random #s in there and it doesn't work. Each postgres server will register the info via exported resources. This is fairly easy with concat (except for the sequence) but w/o it I'm not entirely sure how to make it happen. Thanks -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
