:( I was really asking after the puppet side of dealing w/ a module that wants to install it's own repo's, vs the below.
Anyone else have any thoughts from the original post? On Dec 31, 2012, at 1:56 PM, Dan White <y...@comcast.net> wrote: > Here's what I do on the systems I manage: > > I use Cobbler and Puppet together. Using Cobbler, I make local mirrors of > all the repos I want to use. Then, for the third party repositories, I > copy/symlink from the local mirror into a hand-maintained local repository. > That local repository then is distributed to the servers using a Puppet > yumrepo resource. This lets us control exactly what goes into our servers. > > Hope this helps. Holler if you have more questions. We already do those things, slightly differently but the same idea. I'm actually going to look at Pulp in a bit to better manage that. BTW- we end up using stages for some of the repos, especially EPEL & Centos Base. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
