On Thursday, December 20, 2012 1:45:42 PM UTC-6, Dusty Doris wrote: > > Thanks for the reply. So there is nothing inherently wrong with the > rubygems package that we would run into? We already use rubygems for > several services, so it seems like the easiest route for us. > > Doing a yum install, it wanted to install version 0.24. I will look into > repackaging it though, that might work for us too. > > The version offered to you, if any, is a matter of the yum repositories with which the system is configured. Fedora 9 is pretty old, so PL no longer offers versions packaged specifically for that OS. Fedora 9 is very close to RHEL 5, though, so one of the el5 repositories might be a good bet. Specifically, try repo URL http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/products/i386/ or http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/products/x86_64/ for the main packages.
If yum cannot resolve all the needed dependencies then you could try adding http://yum.puppetlabs.com/el/5/dependencies/(i386|x86_64)/ as well. You can also find source RPMs on that server if you poke around a little. Those would give you a good leg up if you decide to package Puppet yourself. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/H07pvptikAEJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
