Hi,

We have ~20 Red Hat servers and usually use EPEL as third-party repo.  I'm 
currently using the packages provided by this repo (2.6.17-2), but I was 
wondering what were the pros and cons of using puppetlabs' repo instead.  I 
can see that it provides puppet 3.x, facter 1.6.14 and hiera (which is 
unavailable in EPEL but I haven't started using it).  

I currently have a very basic setup but want to use puppet more in the 
future.  I also installed foreman on the same machine, which is not really 
usefull for me because the only thing that works on it is the display of my 
host and facts (I use kickstart scripts for provisionning).  I haven't been 
able to make the rest work (partly because I don't use modules yet).  I can 
see that puppetlabs' repo provides puppet-dashboard which may do the same 
thing and maybe more.

I can see that there are pros to use this repo but if I do, will I have to 
enable it on all my puppet agents or will my EPEL-provided agents be able 
to talk with the 3.0 puppet-server without restriction?

Thanks,

Ugo

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/KOjUMvvEDowJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to