Well, 3 years old or not, this is still in the first page of google results 
haha. I'm running puppet version 2.7.9 and the result of that template is a 
blank comment line for every instance of the Firewall::Rule type. If I 
replace 'resource[:comment]' with 'resource.type' then I can confirm that 
the iteration is actually working, because I see comment lines like this '# 
Firewall::Rule'. I tried 'resources["comment"]', 'resources[:comment]', and 
'resources.comment' (with this one triggering an error).

I wish there was some easy way to get an interactive ruby shell running 
with the same environment so I could actually test this without running 
puppet apply every time, if I could I probably would have figured it out on 
my own already. If you don't know what the answer is, could you maybe point 
me in the general direction of how you would find out? Perhaps a relevant 
part of the puppet source code? And thanks for answering.

On Friday, September 7, 2012 12:52:14 AM UTC-4, Luke Kanies wrote:
>
> Wow, talk about a blast from the past.  I don't get a lot of replies to 3 
> year old email. :)
>
> What happens when you do this?  It looks like it should basically work, 
> although I'd use 'resources' instead of 'vertices', I think.  What version 
> is this?
>
> -- 
> Luke Kanies | http://about.me/lak | http://puppetlabs.com/ | 
> +1-615-594-8199
>  
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/XEXWIRbxz9kJ.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to