So, general puppet design question. I have a definition called create_vg that creates an lvm volume group. An input to this is obviously the list of physical disks. In a normal programming language, I'd put the identification of the physical disks into one function, and pass the result of that to create_vg().
However, since a define in puppet can't return a value (can it?), you don't have many options unless you want to set it as a fact with fact-add, which bothers me, because your effectively than accumulating a list of global variables that may not need to be variable. So, your effectively left with putting the logic that determines the physical disks _inside_ create_vg(). No? Seems so... non functional! Doug -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
