On Tuesday, July 24, 2012 9:17:40 AM UTC-5, olli...@googlemail.com wrote: > > > There is nothing related to this in the debug logs of a run the notify was > put in originally to make sure the class was called which is was. The only > thing in this is that the catalog run completes without error. >
Ok. Is there a question there? Are you still experiencing your problem? > > The plus assignment was because it was an addition rather than a > replacement. > You may have misunderstood me. It *should* be a replacement. It doesn't make sense as an addition, and it might not mean what you want if it were an addition. >From the docs for the 'audit' metaparameter: "Accepts an attribute name, an array *of attribute names*, *or* all" (emphasis added). The 'all' option is already inclusive of any attribute name or names that may have been specified in the base class's resource declaration, so it doesn't need to be an addition. If I take that specification literally, moreover, then 'all' as a member of an array tells puppet to audit a parameter named 'all', not to audit all parameters. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/WchT-c4cZJ8J. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
