On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 9:49 AM, David Schmitt <da...@dasz.at> wrote:
> On 24.07.2012 00:43, Ryan Bowlby wrote: > >> Can anyone comment on their experiences with librarian-puppet or using >> git superproject with per puppet module repositories? We are in the >> midst of determining which route is optimal for our environment. It >> seems like using git superprojects would mean one less new tool for >> everyone to learn. What then would be the advantages of librarian-puppet? >> > > I've played around with repo (android's git forest manager) but it's just > too much complexity for non-developers. I've now switched to everything in > one .git and it's just so much easier to manage. Putting external modules > in a separate branch and then subtree merge is a viable, albeit still too > complex, way for tracking externals. > > I myself still use submodules, as most of my modules are not in the forge, maybe that would change once pulp will offer an alternative. Ohad > > Best Regards, David > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@** > googlegroups.com <puppet-users%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/** > group/puppet-users?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en> > . > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
