On 06/14/2012 03:44 PM, Jo Rhett wrote: > This type of functionality is not only possible, it is documented as > intended for this purpose in the replace parameter. You are again
Huh, I was not aware of this parameter, to be honest. And I'd admit that you do have a point saying that it's not sensible to limit this to file content only but > falling down the rabbit hole of "I don't do it that way, so you > shouldn't either." this is a pretty severe allegation at which I do take offense. I concur that the current feature set is a dangerous trap, but I find the very idea of the replace parameter more questionable than its semantical details. But that's just me. I won't argue this point much further, I'm much more curious about what the community thinks on the matter. Felix -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
