Thanks so much for the enlightenment on this, Steve/Scott. Initially,
I was pondering whether it was possible to make the root-master
trigger the changes on the second-level puppet-masters and then down
to third-level puppet agents. It seems that it is not possible.
Otherwise, the subversion server can connect to the root-master only
instead of syncing all second-level puppet-masters. If I get it wrong,
please let me know. I have only less than 2-weeks of puppet learning.
So, each comment/reply is helpful.

Thanks again for your excellent detailed writings.






On May 27, 9:59 pm, Steve Shipway <s.ship...@auckland.ac.nz> wrote:
> I have set ours up like this.
>
> One top-level puppet server, hosting the CA, Filebucket, and Dashboard.  This 
> uses mod_balancer and mod_proxy to route to...
>
> Three backend puppet masters, handling the production environment manifests
>
> One backend puppet server, handling the dev and test environment manifests
>
> In addition, we have our departmental Subversion server, which synchs the 
> puppet configuration to the three backend servers every 15min.
>
> To make changes, we do this in the test environment, then check it in to 
> subversion and migrate to production, which causes a subsequent synch out to 
> all 3 backend servers within 15min.
>
> We can theoretically have any number of backend production servers now, and 
> the load on the frontend is relatively low.  The CA must be on a single 
> server, and we also put thefilebucket here to save on storage and make the 
> dashboard work better -- though we could always put the filebucket onto a 
> completely separate server if we so wished.  The CA could likewise be farmed 
> out but since its load is negligible theres no point in doing so.  The 
> dashboard could also be on a separate server but again it has low CPU 
> requirements.
>
> We use DNS to point to the top-level server.  Should we wish to have a remote 
> puppet server (to save on bandwidth) then we can set one up with the same 
> synchronisation, but not add it to the balancer group.  Maybe make it use a 
> local filebucket, but it can still use the central CA.
>
> This setup also allows us to have one dashboard, but still allow separate 
> departments to run their own puppet environment behind the one DNS CNAME if 
> they so wish.
>
> Most of the config info was taken from the Puppet book, though it misses out 
> a key configuration item - you need to specify which env var and HTTP header 
> carries the SSL auth information on the backend, unless you keep the CA on 
> the same host.
>
> Steve
>
> Steve Shipway
> University of Auckland ITS
> UNIX Systems Design Lead
> s.ship...@auckland.ac.nz
> Ph: +64 9 373 7599 ext 86487

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to