On Saturday, May 12, 2012 6:14:06 AM UTC-7, Timothy Sutton wrote: > > Just concerning this PSK aspect of Sites, would this also be a similar > alternative to using a shared cert (or set of certs) in tandem with the > node_name_value or node_name_fact, as was recently suggested by Gary in > this thread? > > Yes, absolutely. However, since you're not reusing the same private key for all nodes in your deployment, Sites is a more secure approach to the problem.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/gCtD3UXn13QJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
