On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 6:52 AM, jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 28, 9:53 am, Philip Brown <p...@bolthole.com> wrote:
>
>> Sadly, the chances of getting all sysadmins to be dilligent about creating
>> packages are pretty much zero.
>> They only want to deal with premade downloadable packages.
>
>
> It sounds like you might be able to split this into two parts.  Surely
> there aren't many of those 5800 files that your sysadmins routinely
> change (else they're acting as developers, not admins).  Build a
> package or packages of the binaries, containing also whatever default
> configuration files are appropriate.


I've already said that converting modified files to packages, was not an option.

> And if your admins do not appreciate the advantages of avoiding
> installing unpackaged binaries then you need better admins.

whether or not that is true, unfortunately does not bring me closer to
a usable techical solution :(

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Puppet Users" group.
To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.

Reply via email to