I didn't mean to imply that this was your fault and I already knew that the puppet support probably was missing because it's quite tricky to implement. Since I've started looking into writing my own functions and modules and get a bit deeper into puppet I might actually look into this myself if I find the time. If I make any progress there you can expect a pull request for the changes :)
On Monday, April 23, 2012 3:57:08 PM UTC+2, matti wrote: > > Hi, > > On Monday, 23 April 2012 13:59:00 UTC+1, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > >> Thanks, this looks like it will do the trick. The lack of puppet:// >> support probably means I will have to hard-code a path to a directory >> somewhere but that shouldn't be to big of a deal. >> > [...] > > Apologies for that :-( > > Adding support for "puppet://" is quite tricky (there is a lot going on > under-the-hood with this one), and I never have the time to do it (unless > somebody is willing to help out and/or sponsor). > > For the time being, please bare with fully-qualified paths ... > > KW > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/NAMjjrnooXwJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
