Seems as though instantlinux is deploy'ing a customized OS, however we are dealing with mix of different OS'es (This has to work at least on Linux and Solaris), so doesn't seem like an option
Thomas On Tuesday, March 6, 2012 3:26:19 PM UTC+1, Chuck Anderson wrote: > > Check out InstantLinux as a front-end to puppet: > > http://www.instantlinux.net/ > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 10:51:12PM -0800, Thomas Rasmussen wrote: > > Thanks for the replies, I can see that there is no "easy" setup to allow > > what I'm looking for :-( I will be looking a bit more on the External > Node > > Classifier to see if this will solve my problem. > > > > We will be using puppet to fully automate everything that has to be > > performed on servers, so I will not be interested in using a different > > system to do the app-deployment than to do the OS deployment. > > > > I was hoping that maybe it was possible to do this task through the > > Dashboard, but I discovered that it was only a standard htpassword setup > > without any group knowledge or ACLs on nodes. > > > > Thomas > > > > On Friday, March 2, 2012 10:42:28 AM UTC+1, Thomas Rasmussen wrote: > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > I'm in the process of looking for a way to have developers deploying > > > on their test systems without intervention of sysadmins, to solve this > > > i'd like to use Puppet (either the OSS version or Enterprise, > > > whichever solves the problem). > > > > > > I can manage to only grant access to certain systems and limit the > > > ability to execute puppetd --test, however, the developers would like > > > to create a new version of the application and then this should be put > > > into place instead of the old version, but I can't seem to find a > > > solution to this. > > > > > > I was thinking somewhat on the option to issue a command like this: > > > puppetd --test --my-app-version 3.2.1 > > > > > > And then the puppet manifests will use the my-app-version variable to > > > fetch and deploy this specific version. I know that the manifests > > > should be developed with care, which is also the idea. > > > > > > Or what solutions do people use in case where developers should have > > > access to deploy, but not have access to the puppetmaster server? > > > > > > hope that this can be done. > > > > > > Regards > > > Thomas > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/Qccy9KQGUVEJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
